Proficiency Testing and Laboratory Quality Control

We set up a quality assurance plan that monitors your results both within the laboratory and against other laboratories, and help you interpret proficiency testing results correctly.

Assuring the validity of results

ISO/IEC 17025 clause 7.7 requires laboratories to monitor the validity of their results. Monitoring has two sides: internal quality control within the laboratory and external quality control through proficiency testing (PT) and interlaboratory comparisons (ILC).

Internal quality control

Control samples and control charts, certified reference materials, replicate analyses, blind samples, spike recoveries.

External quality control

PT schemes from providers accredited to ISO/IEC 17043, and interlaboratory comparisons.

Our proficiency testing support

  1. Scope analysis. Grouping tests, matrices and concentration ranges in your scope.
  2. Scheme selection. Identifying schemes and providers that best represent your scope.
  3. Multi-year plan. Every scope group represented at regular intervals.
  4. Result evaluation. z-scores (or En, zeta), trends and consistency with your uncertainty, following ISO 13528 principles.
  5. Unsatisfactory results. Root cause analysis, corrective action and verification of effectiveness, all documented.

Common interpretation: |z| ≤ 2 satisfactory, 2 < |z| < 3 questionable, |z| ≥ 3 unsatisfactory. The provider's stated criteria always take precedence.

Internal QC control charts

Tracking control sample results on Shewhart-type control charts catches performance drift early. We define warning and action limits, interpretation rules and what to do when limits are exceeded. The same data can feed the reproducibility component of your measurement uncertainty budget.

Deliverables

  • Multi-year proficiency testing plan by scope group
  • Result evaluation and trend tracking sheet
  • Root cause analyses and corrective action records for unsatisfactory results
  • Internal quality control plan and control chart templates

How QC results connect to the management system: laboratory quality management.

Prepared by the Molar Çevre technical team · Last reviewed:

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Do you run proficiency testing schemes?

No. We do not operate PT schemes. We help you choose schemes that fit your scope, build a participation plan and evaluate the results.

How is a z-score interpreted?

In common practice |z| ≤ 2 is satisfactory, 2 < |z| < 3 is questionable and |z| ≥ 3 is unsatisfactory. Questionable and unsatisfactory results should be investigated for root cause. Always follow the criteria in the provider's report.

Does an unsatisfactory PT result affect accreditation?

It requires investigation and corrective action. When that process is documented and shown to be effective, it demonstrates that your system works. We prepare the evaluation and evidence with you.

How often should we participate?

Frequency depends on the tests in scope, the availability of suitable schemes and the accreditation body's current policy. We build a multi-year participation plan covering your scope.

Let's map out the roadmap for your laboratory

Book a free initial consultation: we'll review where you are today and prepare a tailored work plan and proposal.

WhatsApp