Analytical Method Validation and Verification

Proving that a method is fit for purpose is the most technical step towards accreditation. We design your validation and verification studies, run the statistics and report them in a way that stands up to assessment.

Validation or verification?

ISO/IEC 17025 requires either verification (clause 7.2.1.5) or validation (clause 7.2.2) for every method a laboratory uses. Getting this decision right avoids unnecessary work as well as assessment findings.

SituationRequired study
Standard method used within its scope, unmodifiedVerification
Laboratory-developed methodValidation
Non-standard methodValidation
Standard method used outside its scope (e.g. another matrix) or modifiedValidation

Performance characteristics we evaluate

Selectivity

Showing that other components in the matrix do not bias the result.

Working range and linearity

Suitability of the calibration model and the range in which results are reliable.

LOD and LOQ

For environmental testing, the limit of quantification must sit comfortably below the legal limit value.

Trueness

Bias from certified reference materials, recovery studies or proficiency testing results.

Precision

Repeatability and within-laboratory reproducibility (intermediate precision).

Robustness

Sensitivity of the method to small changes in temperature, time or reagent lot.

Validation data are also the main input to measurement uncertainty estimation, so planning both together saves time.

Our validation approach

  1. Intended use and acceptance criteria, agreed in writing before any experiments.
  2. Experimental design: replicates, concentration levels, matrices and reference materials.
  3. Data collection with your team and traceable raw data.
  4. Statistical evaluation: outlier tests, regression, F- and t-tests as appropriate.
  5. Report and approval against the pre-defined criteria.
  6. Ongoing monitoring with control charts and proficiency testing.

What is method verification?

Verification demonstrates that you achieve the published performance of a standard method in your own laboratory. Typically trueness, precision and the limit of quantification are compared with the criteria in the method standard or legislation. Even though it is narrower than validation, verification still needs a plan and a report.

Deliverables

  • Validation/verification plan with acceptance criteria
  • Calculation templates and statistical evaluation files
  • Validation and verification reports ready for approval
  • Quality control plan for routine performance monitoring

Prepared by the Molar Çevre technical team · Last reviewed:

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between method validation and verification?

Verification shows that your laboratory can correctly perform an already validated standard method under its own conditions. Validation is the more extensive confirmation that a non-standard, laboratory-developed, modified or out-of-scope method is fit for its intended use.

How is a method validated?

Define the intended use and acceptance criteria first. Then design experiments for selectivity, working range, limits of detection and quantification, trueness, precision and robustness; collect data, evaluate it statistically and approve the result in a report.

Which guidance do you follow?

ISO/IEC 17025 clause 7.2 and the Eurachem guide on the fitness for purpose of analytical methods, together with the performance criteria in the method standard itself and any applicable legal limits.

When does a method need revalidation?

When the method, instrument, critical consumables or scope change significantly. In routine use, performance is monitored with control charts and proficiency testing.

Let's map out the roadmap for your laboratory

Book a free initial consultation: we'll review where you are today and prepare a tailored work plan and proposal.

WhatsApp